|
1) Critical analytical skill applied to interpretation of audiovisual text
|
●Extensive and insightful taxonomy of formal audiovisual elements
●Extensive and insightful causal connections between media aesthetics and rhetoric in relation to social and historical context
●Insightful, persuasive expression of reading |
●Correct and perceptive taxonomy of formal audiovisual elements
●Causal connections between media aesthetics and rhetoric in relation to social and historical context
●Competent expression of reading
|
●Incorrect taxonomy of formal audiovisual elements
●Few clear causal connections between media aesthetics & rhetoric in relation to social and historical context
●Incompetent expression of reading
|
|
2) Knowledge of critical and production terminology
|
●Highly fluent in critical and production terminology
●Extensive mastery of audiovisual narrative conventions
|
●Proficient in critical and production terminology
●Working knowledge of audiovisual narrative conventions
|
●Weak or flawed grasp of critical and production terminology
●Weak or flawed knowledge of audiovisual narrative conventions
|
|
3) Ability to demonstrate, via essay, comprehension of & engagement with a work of contemporary scholarship |
●Clear, insightful thesis
●Evidence always supports arguments
●Strong grasp of work’s relation to field
●Organization fully supports thesis
●Effective, graceful style abetting meaning, free of grammatical error
|
●Clear thesis
●Evidence generally supports arguments
●Grasps work’s relation to field
●Organization generally supports thesis
●No significant style or grammar problems interfering with meaning
|
●No clear thesis
●Evidence fails to support arguments
●Weak grasp of work’s relation to field
●Unclear organization
●Persistent style & grammar problems interfering with comprehension
|
